A relationship wellness app that draws couples closer together by reflecting through the root causes of their emotions.
“The quality of our relationships determines the quality of our lives.” (Perez).
A research done by Arch Insights indicated that close to 90% of the population believe that relationship health to be one of the most important factors for their mental and emotional health. Furthermore, 71% of the correspondents wish that they had more information on how to talk about conflict with their partner. (Arch Insights)
From our user survey, we found that 80% of couples consider relationship conflicts to be extremely painful. Furthermore, they selected communicating emotions to be the most difficult part of resolving conflicts.
While a healthy dose of conflicts can indeed be beneficial to the relationship, not every couple has the toolkit to approach it the right way. Research has shown that repetitive arguments and negative feelings in a relationship are damaging to your health as much as they are to the relationship (Scott). While most conflicts are manageable, and can even be transformed into a positive experience, many couples keep getting stuck in a vicious argument cycle and cannot move beyond their hurt feelings because of a lack of awareness and education, namely on their emotions.
From our user survey, we found that 80% of couples consider relationship conflicts to be extremely painful. Furthermore, they selected communicating emotions to be the most difficult part of resolving conflicts.
Our survey found that cost is the number one factor that deters people from seeking professional help to improve their relationship health. Furthermore, many couples believe that conflicts are normal or at least theirs are, and don’t believe they need to turn it into a bigger deal. In fact, on average, most couples wait six years after identifying a problem before seeking therapy (Gaspard and Gottman). And although 89% of correspondents believe that there would be value in going to couple’s counselling sessions, only 35% of them indicated that they have attended couples counselling (Arch Insights).
That’s why, although there are digital alternatives (e.g., the app Lasting) to in-person counselling at a fraction of the costs, the very fact that it’s labelled as “counselling” deters couples who do not believe that they are “sick” enough to seek help.
Our user research found that people are generally intrigued yet excited about a solution that helps them navigate their emotions and relationship conflicts. However, they do have some concerns. Some of the feedback were:
There is inevitably a void in the market for a discrete, simple, and affordable tool that individuals can use regularly to promote a deeper understanding of their partner and of themselves, and thereby improving their relationship health.
Closer goes through a 5-step process to establish an emotional reconnection.
1. Prompt user to log their trigger - what made them react in the first place. It could be a comment or an eye-roll from the partner.
2.
a. Prompt user to enter the emotions they felt.
b. Prompt user to slow down and reflect what are the underlying pain and fears beneath their emotions.
3.
a. Prompt user to log the actions they took, or how they reacted.
b. Ask user how their partner reacted in retrospect. This is how they get stuck in a push-pull, infinite cycle of conflict.
4. Bring everything together and present them the full conflict cycle:
“When [trigger] happens, I show [emotion] and tell myself that [perception]. The more I [action], the more my partner [partner's action]. But deep down, I'm experiencing [pain] and am protecting myself from [fear/past experiences].”
5. Ask user to communicate this new understanding of the conflict to the partner. Sharing vulnerabilities is extremely difficult, as the communicator does not know how the receiver will react. But this is the most important step in breaking the cycle, as it will help the couple reconnect emotions and understand each other’s true feelings.
To some extent, Closer can be used as a digital, self-serve version of EFT couple therapy. The method is simple but effective: by going through this process of “de-escalation of cycle”, the user gains an understanding of what triggers them, what is the pain beneath it, and can stop the cycle by facing and processing what makes them vulnerable.
After we show the prototype to users again, we’ve noticed that users think differently than we do. It’s important to not have assumptions when conducting usability tesings and ask leading questions. I’ve noticed that users get distracted by small details so it’s important to keep the designs clean so the user can focus more.
Overall creating high-fidelity design is a valuable experience to me becauseg there’s a big difference between working solo vs working with the team. Also working on mobile designs is different than web app because the specs are different, also how you arrange the placement of elements is different.
It’s important not to jump into conclusion too fast or think about new features that are not the MVPs.
It’s easy to change designs on Figma because it can all look great, but it’s not easy for engineers to change features that have been built. So it’s important to stick with what have been discussed and not make changes without communicating with the team.
Where is it hosted?
rickymormor1@gmail.com nicoxu1000@gmail.com what about the backend?
What is your tech stack?
High level journey of a request
rickymormor1@gmail.com nicoxu1000@gmail.com
What was the hardest part of development?
What are some key takeaways?
We learned to work with the product manager and designer in an agile environment.
If we had more time, we would have implemented the following features:
